首页> 外文OA文献 >Multicanonical Methods vs. Molecular Dynamics vs. Monte Carlo: Comparison for Lennard-Jones Glasses
【2h】

Multicanonical Methods vs. Molecular Dynamics vs. Monte Carlo: Comparison for Lennard-Jones Glasses

机译:多声方法与分子动力学与蒙特卡罗:   Lennard-Jones眼镜的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We applied a multicanonical algorithm (entropic sampling) to atwo-dimensional and a three-dimensional Lennard-Jones system withquasicrystalline and glassy ground states. Focusing on the ability of thealgorithm to locate low lying energy states, we compared the results of themulticanonical simulations with standard Monte Carlo simulated annealing andmolecular dynamics methods. We find slight benefits to using entropic samplingin small systems (less than 80 particles), which disappear with larger systems.This is disappointing as the multicanonical methods are designed to surmountenergy barriers to relaxation. We analyze this failure theoretically, and show(1) the multicanonical method is reduced in the thermodynamic limit (largesystems) to an effective Monte Carlo simulated annealing with a randomtemperature vs. time, and (2) the multicanonical method gets trapped byunphysical entropy barriers in the same metastable states whose energy barrierstrap the traditional quenches. The performance of Monte Carlo and moleculardynamics quenches were remarkably similar.
机译:我们将多规范算法(熵采样)应用于具有准晶态和玻璃态基态的二维和三维Lennard-Jones系统。着眼于算法定位低能态的能力,我们将多规范模拟的结果与标准蒙特卡洛模拟退火和分子动力学方法进行了比较。我们发现在较小的系统(少于80个粒子)中使用熵采样会带来一些好处,而在较大的系统中则消失了,这令人失望,因为多规范方法旨在克服能量弛豫的障碍。我们从理论上分析了这种失效,并表明(1)多规范方法在热力学极限(大型系统)中降低为有效的蒙特卡洛模拟退火,且温度随时间随机变化;(2)多规范方法被非物理熵障碍所困。具有相同能量传递障碍的传统亚稳态。蒙特卡洛的性能和分子动力学猝灭非常相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号